Dear Editor
Rammya Mathew’s powerful, and moving, description of the disruption caused by overuse of tests and reminders deserves much wider readership -- for example, by every specialist group seeking to add yet another nudge to clinical practice. The call by the Chief Medical Officers and other leaders in the first editorial of the 2020s -- responding to the challenge of multimorbidity -- has had little impact and it is up to GPs to practise Cluster Medicine for people like me, with four diagnoses and eight pills, who are not fortunate enough to be supported by Geriatric Medicine.
The General Practitioner needs time for empathy and time to focus in those precious minutes of the consultation without even more low value prompts for action. I was recently informed I had ‘pre-diabetes’, with a body mass index of 23, adding yet more time required for a doctor or nurse to explain what pre-diabetes is thought to be.
The people called patients also have a part to play. They need to be prompted to think more clearly before they arrive at the consultation -- for example, about what is actually bothering them most and about what questions they want to ask. They also need to be given reading and learning about, for example, HbA1C or how to manage anxiety about their conditions. This obviously requires a digital wellbeing service for better self care, and for digital groups to meet with others with the same problem who are there 24/7. Many people are not yet online but this is changing and everyone will have ‘the internet’ for a ‘mains’ knowledge service just as they have mains electricity and water.
Rammya Mathew’s analysis needs its own editorial linked back the CMO’s editorials on multi morbidity and on secondary prevention
Competing interests: We are developing a digital self care service
Re: Junior doctors’ strikes: it’s time to stop the walkouts and start negotiations
Dear Editor
The moral obligation to strike and the temptation of extremism
Fraz Mir argues that the recent industrial action by junior doctors put patients in harm’s way, endangered them by compromising their safety, created hardship for thousands (if only in the short term) and was likely to have eroded public trust in the medical profession (1). Presented in this way, industrial action by doctors looks like a definitive moral wrong.
However, much of the argument about the ethics of industrial action by doctors runs in the opposite direction. In a socialised health care system concrete circumstances promoting conflict between doctors and the State must be considered, alongside general ethical principles. Toynbee and colleagues (2) point out that the change to a shift-based system has decreased the number of junior doctors on site at any given time, whilst intensifying their workload and eroding the quality of care. Junior doctors have largely lost control of their training which they experience as inflexible, impersonal and overly specialised (just when the NHS needs generalists). All of this was rewarded by a 15% real term reduction in salaries between 2009 and 2014. It is hardly surprising that junior doctors have opted for industrial action.
Limited short-term industrial action seems unlikely to be harmful to patients (2) and emergency care may even improve (3). The erosion of the quality of care poses a longer-term risk to the public. Davies argues that “If the conditions that doctors work under put patients at risk, then (on balance) they are morally obliged to strike” (4) .
Roberts (5) offers some ethical conditions for legitimate industrial action: strikes should be proportionate, not obviously futile, a last resort, organised through a body with a legitimate claim to represent medical interests and announced in advance. Health services should nonetheless ensure that emergency care is made available during walkouts, and that junior doctors “avoid the temptation of extremism by protecting the weak and the vulnerable during their quarrels with their employer” (4).
1) Mir FA Junior Doctors’ strikes: it’s time to stop the walkouts and start negotiations BMJ 2023:381:p813
2) Toynbee M, Al-Diwani AAJ,Clacey J, Broome MR J.Med Ethics 2016;42: 167-170
3) Metcalfe D, Chowdhury, Salim A What are the consequences when doctors strike? BMJ 2015;351: h6231
4) Davies M Is it ethical for doctors to strike? BMJ 2015; 351:h5597
5) Roberts AJ A framework for assessing the ethics of doctor’s strikes J Med Ethics 2016;42(11) 698-700
Competing interests: No competing interests